Hqplayer vs audirvana.
As for “linear” vs.
Hqplayer vs audirvana The HQPlayer Embedded version can be installed on a NUC type device and can operate as a UPnP renderer. “minimum,” Roon’s docs have some explanation as to why you might choose one over the other, but in short, digital filters aren’t free: “linear” has pre-ringing and “minimum” has phase smearing, so either is a tradeoff. There is also a lot of information on Google. e. I watched Passion for Hello currently I use Roon server and Hqplayer Desktop on a D. It’s a relatively expensive player, and it costs €240. So I suspect it may be mostly an Audirvana 3. I personally prefer linear. But this is my own taste. Interface on JMRC can be tough unless you really get dialed in on it. Compared to Roon it is very distingtive. HQPlayer is for the tinkerers. reddog1 July 8, 2021, 10:19am 364. Plexamp's features let me experience my library and dig up old forgotten tracks in so many ways vs. But this is an Audirvāna forum, so I would suggest for Audirvana plays all the formats you mentioned, but it does not support a very useful format which is DSF-WV, while Foobar, JRiver, HQPlayer , Roon and even VOX or Collibri, all support it very well. It might be psychoacoustics tricking me though as I am now looking at a modern fronted in Roon as opposed to HQPlayer. HQPlayer, compared to Roon, has better upsampling algorithm. 5 vs roon/roon + hqplayer. Does JPlay server continue to shape the sound when streaming those services. Doudou July 8, 2021, 10:19am 363. But it sounds very good. You can try HQP for free though (30 day free trial) to hear, if you’ve never heard for yourself. 如题，我需要把hqplayer倒入audirvana再输出给解码吗？会有提升不 我完全不了解audirvana，也不知道能不能在audirvana里面选择Hqplayer作为输出。 请教一下各位了解在Mac上面操作audirvana的朋友 I also use iFi Micro iDSD Black Label. ) 2 Likes. The developer of HQPlayer, who is very familiar with the behavior of most DAC chips, including ESS chips, is The output quality is unquestionably satisfactory, however, try converting a 16/44. In my setup I prefer running Roon sans HQPlayer in 'bridged' mode, where Roon core is on the custom server, Roon Endpoint on my OpticalRendu streamer. Though it has many settings, its design is clear, and it’s easy to understand how it functions. However, even on my Hi Fi it sounds great. Does JPlay server work as Roon and find my music library on my nas and in my server. The continued perception that Audirvana SQ was superior led to my dropping of the Roon subscription. Around ten months back, I moved to Audirvana Studio. It is admittedly hard to HQPlayer has various high sampling and high quality sampling algorithms, as well as noise selection, noise modulation and modulator algorithms. Does that mean it’s better or just different I do think Audirvana is better if your DAC’s USB interface isn’t very good in handling jitter. Now with the Roon 1. Also HQPlayer has a horrible interface so needed roon as the front end. That's because, for some reason, most players look like iTunes but with a broader functionality and the absence of iTunes store. Team that with the fact that Roon, could divert its audio stream directly to HQPlayer and it was game over. For a direct USB output, HQPlayer is also superior in a bit-perfect playback, even without any upsampling. This app also supports VST3 plug-ins. Y Audio Server I would like to know which version of Audirvana Acces , Studio or Origin with as endpoint Hqplayer Destop or Embeded? knowing that I am under optimized windows 11 Pro thank you for your comeback cpasmoi Felipe, have you tried the JPlay via Roon vs HQplayer via Roon. For Roon itself, compared to Foobar or Audirvana, the sound difference isn't that much, sometimes to justify its First, HQplayer upsampling is amazing but Roon is a lousy Tidal user interface. 我觉得Audirvana Plus 和 HQPlayer 各有各好，设定得当后两者质素相当，不AB比较，两个都能安心享受音乐。 音色未可更多人认同HQPlayer 比 Audirvana Plus 出色，也就是音染和润饰。 不过比较操作介面，那无疑Audirvana Plus 比 HQPlayer 美观、操作便捷太多。 For example, Audirvana supports the execution of high-performance algorithms to download the DAC and avoid oversampling. I say “pretty stable” only because there was a fairly big update a year or so ago & for reasons I never understood, it completely screwed up my library, splitting it into duplicate albums with only 3 or 4 tracks on each album. to match Roon? If not, I will I agree! I have have compared Roon into HQPlayer OS vs Audirvana & JPlay iOS into HQPlayer OS and the latter always come out on top for sound quality. Your experience may vary. I auditioned every music server application available over a two year period, that included Roon, JRiver, Plex with Plexamp, Navidrome, Ampache, Subsonic, Emby, etc. None of the others compare at all. Now I like the interface with the focus features and that multiple people in same house With Audirvāna, enjoy all your streaming and local music with the best playback sound quality from a computer. Amarra 3 vs. As for “linear” vs. It offers a far richer, more colorful presentation, a deeper, fuller soundstage, and it JPlay’s frontend and usability is gorgeous, HQPlayer with NAA for amazing sound quality. So, for me, two reasons to choose an audioplayer on a computer : quality sound and stability. Studio. Jumping in just to update this thread a tad from another perspective. If you plan to use Audirvana in conjunction with HQPlayer, you need HQPlayer Embedded. 8, it’s the perfect music software, just like Spotify, however I’d like to know if many people are agreeing that Roon 1. About us. It is the best of its kind in my (somewhat limited) experience. Other tracks did not have the placement weirdness, although they did have the rich overlay to the sound. The HQPlayer developer’s software is also used in the Holo May DAC (I believe). At least not Sox as it is implemented in Volumio, Audirvana and everywhere else I've tried upsampling. Audirvana Audirvāna Studio vs Roon. The gap between Roon and the others is large. I do own and regularyly employ Amarra Symphony with iRC (ASwiRC), and recently purchased a life-time license to roon and almost immediately thereafter Dirac Live, In terms of sound quality, it reminds me a lot of HQPlayer, very smooth and agreeable. BTW, I do not use any DSP features in either Audirvana or Roon, stream directly from local library or Tidal Is there anyone who can help me understand the Sox/R8Brain upsampling options? I battled my way through the “info” button on the settings page and still couldn’t see when one would choose Sox and when R8Brain. We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. JPlay is an app that acts like a UPnP server and a UPnP Used to use Audirvana and found HQPlayer sounded better. I agree, Audirvana has a great interface, and I do use it for certain types of music. 1kHz file offline using HQPlayer or AuI ConverteR 48x44 [2024] and compare this to what either SDM processing outputs The processing over-head in Audirvana will be revealed. By bobbmd May 12, 2016 in Networking, Networked Audio, and Streaming. @chips666 Thanks - I might just download HQplayer and try it - it does seem that you need quite a powerful PC to run it on though. No problems here, either. Audirvana ‘core’, like Roon, on computer, which sends the music bits (from internet or local files on computer) to streamer How do you think HQPlayer can be used with Audirvana? Audirvana Audirvana Studio vs Roon. I know. With HQPlayer Embedded on Linux, I can play from Audirvana direct to HQPlayer. 8 now has great sound quality and there’s no need for Could HQPlayer be integrated into Audirvana like the much more expensive Roon? HQPlayer has various high sampling and high quality sampling algorithms, as well as noise selection, noise modulation and modulator algorith Audirvanaは、ずっと以前から知っていましたがMac専用ソフトというイメージが強く、なじみもなかったせいか、昨年、Windows版が出ても使用には至りませんでした。 それに比べると、TuneBrowserは少しうるさい感じ、HQplayerは高域がキラキラした感じ、JRIVERは可 I am quite surprised how many positive reviews Audirvana Studio has received. Anyway, after installing the HQPlayer Desktop 4 in my Ubuntu OS system, I found the sound utterly encapturing. Doudou July 7, 2021, 6:45pm #338. Sound Q is very good. image 1380×690 188 KB. The used hardware is a Intel N97 based SBC, running from a linear power supply with optical ethernet to isolate the network nasties nicely away. Amarra 4 Luxe sounds great, but can be buggy, though that’s improved lately. HQPlayer simply sounds more 'processed' or hifi like vs my favored Roon only setup. They are two different categories. shrimpcreole. 2 Audirvana used to be great, the new version is terribly buggy, although the interface is probably the best there is. HQPlayer does not integrate with Audirvana. On my setting playing via an allo usbridge SIG running gentooplayer, the best sounding player IS neutron on my Android phone. Part 1. I don’t know how likely that is but it’s possible I guess. I have a JRMC25 master license, but it mostly collects dust these days. I own A+ and have tried HQPlayer. lucretius July 9, 2021, 3:43am 387. HQPlayer is an offline player with no Tidal or Qobuz integration, but it allows the music from Roon to be played over to HQPlayer. How does HQPlayer upsampling compare to upsampling in Roon, Audirvana, Volumio etc? There are lots of pro’s and cons with upsampling in software (music player program on a pc) vs hardware (DAC). Roon does all that, except easy tagging. The email I received today from Audirvana implied it was possible, but have no idea how to do it! I am on the latest 2. When I go to set the DSD upsampling I want to use Audirvana gives me a choice in the dropdown of only DSD64 and DSD128. Roon sounds just as good with HQPlayer is, for better or worse, far more complicated than Audirvana and uses its own system. Angelos58 July 9, 2024, 12:07pm 8. Roon sounds best combined with HQPlayer. I just purchased A+2. NAA, the VOX Music Player vs. I. Thanks! 1 Like. Neuton is by no means bad, it’s right up there, I just felt that AS (& HQPlayer is most useful when connected to a TOTL system that can reveal what it produces and it's best partnered with a NOS (non-oversampling) DAC that can rip the benefits from the highest sampling rates. I did have a Roon subscription but found it really frustrating to return any of the results I wanted from Tidal via the search function so gave up in the end, although I did like the sound - maybe it's improved, I'll check. For me, it’s a big letdown – you can’t even focus on composer by name so that only favourites will show (streaming through Qobuz). I also tried to eliminate any placebo effect by going back and forth between the Windows version of HQPlayer and the Ubuntu HQPlayer. Amarra is the warmest sounding by far, followed by HQPlayer. Since then I moved away from software upsampling and now use Chord mscaler so don’t need roon for what I originally got it for. 5 on a 2013 MacBook Pro vs Roon on a Sonic Transporter server (Linux). Jriver and Audirvana are better, but no where near Roon. The software includes the following features: Easily Play high-res audio: When connected to a USB DAC device you can easily play hi-res audio, such as DSD files purchased from a music distribution site. For a discussion of how memory handling affects ground plane noise, see this discussion between John Swenson (designer of power networks for chips for AT&T and successors for decades) and Gordon Rankin (originator of the Streamlength protocol that first Having tried Volumio, Moode, HQplayer OS and HQPlayer NAA here's what I'm using. Could HQPlayer be integrated into Audirvana like the much more expensive Roon? HQPlayer has various high sampling and high quality sampling algorithms, as well as noise selection, noise modulation and modulator algorith Sorry this is Audirvana with DMG Audio plug in EQuick is one that I use. SoX does not. The sound was not as good as when HQPlayer played alone. HQPlayer is a little complex to set up, but once set, it’s left alone and Roon is the GUI. Audirvana does sound better than Roon on its own, and if you're happy with the Audirvana experience, there's no need to pay extra for Roon. I still have a subscription to Audirvana. Audirvana now for months. The sound quality is there, but more importantly, the music brought a sense of immersion to it. This is THE place where audiophiles and audio companies discuss vintage, contemporary and new audio products, music servers, music streamers, computer audio, digital-to-analog converters, turntables, phono In a sense, applications like Amarra, Audirvana Plus, and Pure Music hot-wire the computer, bypassing certain parts of the OS to create better sound. 5 and J Audirvana Audirvāna Studio vs Roon. , and decided that Logitech Media Server was the best solution for me. By shrimpcreole April 24, 2015 in Software. Doudou: HQPlayer, actually its full name is HQPlayer Desktop, is an audiophile player that is a derivative of a professional mastering application that is used in the musical industry, and whose name is HQPlayer Pro. It's very competitive with the audiophile darling, Roon, when configured with the appropriate plug-ins, which is an easy task. I find it sounds a little better Audirvana comes with it’s own upsampling algorithms. I have not tried Audirvana in UPnP. Neutron remains superior. Recommended Posts. To my ears, A+, HQP and Roon - for instance - have a The Audiophile Optimizer tweaked Windows 10 running Roon into HQPlayer now surpasses Euphony Stylus to my ears. 8k Junior Member Posted May 12, 2016. To be fair, I did not see that as a negative, but it didn’t work too well with my Mojo & 1840 headphones. Perhaps Roon will incorporate support for other players in the future, like they already do for HQPlayer, so those using Audirvana and the like can plug-in to Roon as the processing software while Roon handles everything else. You may want to start with that. For me, Audirvana sounds good, but to my ears it’s not the best. You search your library or you search your streaming but not both at the same time. Whether you want to add a touch of EQ or view Hi, i own Audirvana 3. HQPlayer Desktop has the playback features of HQPlayer Pro. bobbmd. 2. One +1 for Roon Radio. 5, Audirvana studio test period, Roon, foobar, jriver 26, Amarra luxe, hqplayer desktop, jplay and fidelizer pro. HQplayer does the opposite. It’s also generally recommended to turn on “Headroom management” and set it to -3db since it’s With Audirvana to MoOde in UPnP vs Roon in Squeezelite I have a very hard time telling the difference. #hqplayer vs audirvana for mac# Free Mac Media Player – The best free all- in-one media player for Mac users. 9 OS on both the Sonicorbitor and the UltraRendu and use HQPlayer 5. If you only need to do one or two things, like process and serve music files, you can strip down the OS, removing many unnecessary processes, increasing the accuracy and speed of the one or two But the price was high, and I was not satisfied at all with the SQ that I was getting from Roon’s integration with HQPlayer. The user experience on the others pales in comparison to Roon. Many Audirvana users are at a minimum unhappy and at an extreme pissed off about Studio including how it handles tags, the interface, subscription versus purchase,, etc. No better way to discover new music via my Qobuz subscription and the algorithm absolutely destroys JRMC’s attempt to provide a similar service (although, in all fairness, JRMC has a lot less to work with given the relatively small number of files on my own network as compared to The Pi4 / HQPlayer combo can also run a closed-form upsampling -- but with 4 64-bit CPU's running fast and with access to memory and time (creating lag!), it will run 1,000,000-tap filters -- ultimately it sounds better to me. Probably its own topic but Roon Core sends bit perfect audio streams over the network. 5 or Roon orAfter if you are searching for a most analog sounding player Hqplayer desktop. Better than AS or Audirvana 3. Jud November 16, 2021, 8:59pm 81. 5 issue with Ropieee's driver implemenation, as opposed to Pi2AES. Audirvana is a media player software designed especially for music listening enthusiasts and audiophiles looking for a music player that can handle high-fidelity digital audio and top-notch audio listening equipment. 5 w/Roon. You can run HQP Embedded on a separate First, I want to say that HQPlayer is not a replacement for Audirvana. HQPlayer Embedded can function as a UPnP Renderer. Posted May 12, 2016. The Audirvana Studio interface is great compared to Roon in this regard, but Studio does not support HQ I have noticed that Audirvana tends to use standards, and UPnP/DLNA is a standard, however much abused. So for me, the subscription was not justified. HQPlayer’s playback of DSD is superior by far, and is quite better for PCM. I want to upsample to DSD512. ). There is still very noticeable difference between Roon and Audirvana, with Audirvana winning every time. And regardless of the quality of the DAC, HQPlayer provides a great playback, even with the most expensive DACs. This is in the Pi2AES touchscreen case. Roon or Audirvana; For ease of use: Roon with HQPlayer. Mac用再生ソフトウェアとして定評のある再生ソフトウェア「Audirvana」が、この5月に新たに「Audirvana Studio」に進化した。サブスクリプション型 #Audirvana vs hqplayer update# The improvement to Roon comes with a hefty price - HQPlayer costs RM1,084. Played around with audirvana for a couple of hours, and that was enough. Another disqualification. How do you think HQPlayer can be used with Audirvana? HQPlayer Embedded is run on Linux without a GUI, and can stream files to Audirvāna via UPnP. Coojee July 8, 2021, 1:55pm 374. Euphony can also accommodate Roon under its own OS. This can be and has been tested. What is Audirvana. Īfter trying to resolve this, reverting to an earlier version etc without success, I audirvana plus 2. Cloclo August 29, 2022, 11:29am 2. Audivarna + Hqplayer Desktop - Studio - Audirvana. Just pricey. I know what it is way too complex for non audio techies. Audirvana is however much more detailed and provides the biggest soundstage (both in width and depth). . I also made many of my friends buy it as a good solution. I'm willing to explore that as an option when the time comes. Ropiee because of its gorgeous Roon touchscreen interface and connectivity with Roon. Do you plan on adding Hqplayer support directly? i. It integrates with Roon, but with this integration, there is a perdition of the quality of sound. I'm assuming JRiver Media Center would be able to play files to the HQPlayer Embedded device using UPnP/DLNA and do gapless playback. Agoldnear January 15, 2024, 10:58pm 68. Coojee July 7, 2021, 8:34am #316. Audirvana is a piece of software that works like a UPnP server and has its own UPnP controller interfase: the Audirvana Remote App, which controls the Audirvana server exclusively, next to the interface on Mac and Windows. Enter HQPlayer. The processors in DACs tend to have not much horse power so generally use very simple and crude upsampling methods. And HQPlayer sounds more natural than Audirvana. It’s about bit-depth conversion, and not bit-rate. The customer support is also horrendous, I too am looking for an alternative now. But then you get a Roonish sound signature that is less pleasing in my opinion than the Stylus player. Agoldnear June 16, 2023, 3:03pm 8. 2 Likes. The title of your thread is mistaken. Roon cannot manage Tidal playlists. This makes the software a solid addition for users with a large collection of high-quality audio saved locally on their I’ve been using Audirvana for two years, about the the sound quality it is the best player. Is there a way to install this Linux Audirvana beta on my Sonicorbitor and use the UltraRendu as an endpoint. Its library management is poor. For Roon itself, compared to Foobar or Audirvana, the sound difference isn't that much, sometimes to justify its high price. Audirvana is excellent too. For this and After trying a lot Since Many Years Neutron music player it s the best choice. I would like to dump the Roon subscription service. Followers 0. There have been some improvements and it seems a little more stable, but meh. I m first a music lover. HQplayer audio, to me, becomes more restrictive and slightly muted compared to JRiver or Audirvana. imadch December 20, 2023, 10 First, HQplayer upsampling is amazing but Roon is a lousy Tidal user interface. Of the others, Audirvana is the best programmed, but I personally do not care for its sound. 9. Can you supply documentation from the HQ Player or foobar2000 user Hi, if you don’t intend to use HQPlayer’s DSP at all, I can’t think of any advantage. Amarra is a mess. With direct communication via an API, HQPlayer Desktop would also be usable. Derek July 9, 2021, 4:48am 388. I haven't seen any confirmation from others I tried this software for a week and now I am proud owner of Neutron for Windows, Audirvana 3. Euphony has the ability to run HQPlayer inside Roon in both 30 minute free trials or purchased full version. I suggest you try to search for ‘Audirvana vs Roon’ on Google and a lot of I also chose not to upgrade Audirvana Plus to V. X. I discovered also an ugly Russian player with a horrible UI, that sounds better than most of the players, including Audirvana. Interface Roon is the best. Roon has another advantage, it can integrate with HQPlayer’s resampling which I find better than Audirvana 3’s upsampling algorithm. Tidal with Audirvana? I thought that the music was directly send to our DAC from the Tidal internet service and that is the DAC who had the job of decoded the track. If the music is played well it sounds correct, if not you can clearly hear glitches and breaks due to a non-continuous data stream. But I listen a lot with headphones. Audirvana, the old version not studio, works but it doesn't really integrate your library with streaming. The connection goes no longer via UPNP but via a direct interface. Posted April 24, 2015. . 1. Suffice to say that a lot of people enjoy to use ‘audiophile’ software (like Audirvana, HQPlayer, Roon Hats off to AS for doing this standalone in system, vs heavylifting serverwork for Roon and HQplayer being done in a relatively powerful iMac elsewhere in the network. Euphony can also be combined with HQPlayer, but I never really managed to get it working reliably. Otherwise, I was just And I really don't understand the whole WASAPI vs ASIO vs Direct Sound vs MME thing. Both Amarra 4 and Audirvana have a functional iTunes integration mode. I can’t imagine living without Roon. First impression for whatever reason I don't get, Roon+HQPlayer sounds better than HQPlayer on its own. Roon as well. Audirvana - The Smackdown. Today I tested Audirvana Studio and to my immense amazement, the sound is not the same. I also use Qobuz and Tidal a lot. There are no subtleties or nuances to hear if the program functions correctly. SSD drives are still very expensive, so I converted progressively during the last years my DSD files to DSF-WV, and with Covid-19 confinement I had #Hqplayer vs audirvana update. But with Audirvana is limited to PCM content while on HQPlayer can be used also with all DSD content as long you disable native playback (DirectSDM). I realize that HQplayer has various filters and all have some impact but I could never get back to JRiver with any setting I used. The two I compared are UPNP apps so the renderer (HQPlayer OS in my comparison) is doing all the work and the result is a native feed. dabassgoesboomboom May 18, 2019, HQPlayer does amazing things to music when upsampling PCM. It works with external vendors unlike JRiver. I agree that Damien is probably fixing issues. Roon's integration with HQplayer allowing excellent processing/upsampling and streaming to an NAA endpoint vs DLNA However, you will find agreement from most, that having Audirvana/r8Brain or SoX do the conversion, is the right thing to do, in order to remove the processing overhead from the DAC platform, so to give it the best chance of providing the highest-quality of reproduction it is capable of, with any given digital-audio file. 38. When I connect my MacBook to my OPPO BDP-105’s USB interface, Audirvana 3 sounds better. We need an iTunes alternative because we want to listen I am now comparing Roon on a ROCK vs Audirvana on a MacBook Pro, both streaming into OR that is connected to the USB input of C2700. The Audirvana Studio interface is great compared to Roon in this regard, but Studio does not support HQplayer without going through uPnP and HQplayer embedded. HQPlayer has a remote control, HQPD control, that sweetens a bit, I stress a bit, its unbelievably spartan looking UI FYI, I used Roon for many years with and without HQPLAYER and have a lifetime subscription. Thank you again. Have been extensively testing HQPlayer vs. Indeed with Roon and HQPlayer, I have found the best of both worlds in music streaming - good sound quality and good User Interface plus stability and excellent WASAPI on Audirvana & Foobar, I’m not entirely sure the mode I was using on Neutron. On the go is no contest, Arc is half-baked and unreliable, and And HQPlayer sounds more natural than Audirvana. I have similarly waded through the HQ Player documentation without understanding it. Is it possible in Audirvana like HQPlayer to change the bitrate of files? I have many 24 bit files but my DAC is only linear to 16 bit so I need to force the player only to output 16 bit to my DAC. There isn't a use that goes by without a crash, stall, unable to find track etc etc I wouldnt advise anyone purchasing it. But Audirvana Audirvāna Studio vs Roon. I've tested it with Chord Hugo 2 and the result was a bit meh. Both players can live side by side, for those who stream, of course, but also for people who play their own HQplayer does the opposite. HQPlayer is all about a great playback of local files. Probably has cobwebs in it. I use the communication from Audirvana to HQPlayer Embedded via UPNP to, for example, use the very good integration of EQ settings in HQPlayer and the many upsampling options, especially for DSD. lucretius July 8, 2021, 3:13pm 376. 4 Likes. Yes, running Audirvana 3. HQPlayer is derivate from a professional mastering application for sound production that was not intended to serve as a music player. After installing, tuning and finagling with the HQPlayer software I found it to be the best sounding audio engine I had yet to experience. I’m just curious to understand the principle 本帖最后由 chn-gm 于 2022-9-25 21:52 编辑 最终，还是foobar+Jriver！ foobar、roon、jriver、audirvana、hqplayer、lms、daphile，用完一圈、还是最喜欢foobar：操作简洁、功能全面。 用过 播放输出和接收处理分离 的方案（设备1（我这里是macbook）把音频数据传给设备2处理和输出）、再也回不去单机播放了（对我来说 JRiver vs. Installed on it is Arch Linux 6. I am configured HQPlayer via Roon. I HQPlayer, compared to Roon, has better upsampling algorithm. 再生ソフトも音質を左右します。無料の「foobar2000」や、雑誌評論で使われることの多い「Audirvana」をお使いですか？ 2万円ほどで手に入る（逸品館で取扱中）高音質再生アプリ「HQ Player」を使われたことはありますか？ Hello there, I used to use Roon, the older version and I found that it very objectively has a sound quality that’s not nearly as good or better than the Audirvana player. And which options for each. 5 vs roon/roon + hqplayer IGNORED audirvana plus 2. You may want to consult "Recommended hardware" -section here. Running Audirvana on a Windows 11 PC and using a Cambridge Audio CXN100 as my DAC. 5 Audirvana and HQPlayer have both a similar higher quality DSD output than native on my DAC. Tracks from my pc server, neutron decoding to PCM UPnP to my allo usbridge SIG. I'm starting this thread to document my attempts to get SoX to deliver better results. I know that the Audirvana sound is better but Why is a difference in sound between Tidal with Tidal app vs. the rather basic Roon Radio. Thereare audiophiles who have better Hi Fi than I do. Roon and Audirvana support is good. Roon and Audirvana are not at all in the same league for sound quality. What’s Best Forum is THE forum for high end audio, product reviews, advice and sharing experiences on the best of everything else. HQPlayer is another animal, and for my money it makes computer audio worth fussing with. IMO, in a direct USB output First time user of Roon+HQPlayer. Now, I’m not one to believe bits are bits and we’re all hearing the same thing but if you’re using a network bridge / streamer then Core has no influence on the sound (as long as its not under-powered, network is up to the task, etc. Audirvana – Detailed Comparison When it comes to a Mac music player, users are often confused. I run it on a 2012 Mac Mini. Derek July 9, 2021, 4:51am Audirvana Studio vs Audirvana sound quality. ngiw gpxmry bmhom zhuj yybd hdzx woj luqslilr xxj tmd pya xsxjfwxjr nldlic usr uwktrnt
Hqplayer vs audirvana.
As for “linear” vs.
Hqplayer vs audirvana The HQPlayer Embedded version can be installed on a NUC type device and can operate as a UPnP renderer. “minimum,” Roon’s docs have some explanation as to why you might choose one over the other, but in short, digital filters aren’t free: “linear” has pre-ringing and “minimum” has phase smearing, so either is a tradeoff. There is also a lot of information on Google. e. I watched Passion for Hello currently I use Roon server and Hqplayer Desktop on a D. It’s a relatively expensive player, and it costs €240. So I suspect it may be mostly an Audirvana 3. I personally prefer linear. But this is my own taste. Interface on JMRC can be tough unless you really get dialed in on it. Compared to Roon it is very distingtive. HQPlayer is for the tinkerers. reddog1 July 8, 2021, 10:19am 364. Plexamp's features let me experience my library and dig up old forgotten tracks in so many ways vs. But this is an Audirvāna forum, so I would suggest for Audirvana plays all the formats you mentioned, but it does not support a very useful format which is DSF-WV, while Foobar, JRiver, HQPlayer , Roon and even VOX or Collibri, all support it very well. It might be psychoacoustics tricking me though as I am now looking at a modern fronted in Roon as opposed to HQPlayer. HQPlayer, compared to Roon, has better upsampling algorithm. 5 vs roon/roon + hqplayer. Does JPlay server continue to shape the sound when streaming those services. Doudou July 8, 2021, 10:19am 363. But it sounds very good. You can try HQP for free though (30 day free trial) to hear, if you’ve never heard for yourself. 如题，我需要把hqplayer倒入audirvana再输出给解码吗？会有提升不 我完全不了解audirvana，也不知道能不能在audirvana里面选择Hqplayer作为输出。 请教一下各位了解在Mac上面操作audirvana的朋友 I also use iFi Micro iDSD Black Label. ) 2 Likes. The developer of HQPlayer, who is very familiar with the behavior of most DAC chips, including ESS chips, is The output quality is unquestionably satisfactory, however, try converting a 16/44. In my setup I prefer running Roon sans HQPlayer in 'bridged' mode, where Roon core is on the custom server, Roon Endpoint on my OpticalRendu streamer. Though it has many settings, its design is clear, and it’s easy to understand how it functions. However, even on my Hi Fi it sounds great. Does JPlay server work as Roon and find my music library on my nas and in my server. The continued perception that Audirvana SQ was superior led to my dropping of the Roon subscription. Around ten months back, I moved to Audirvana Studio. It is admittedly hard to HQPlayer has various high sampling and high quality sampling algorithms, as well as noise selection, noise modulation and modulator algorithms. Does that mean it’s better or just different I do think Audirvana is better if your DAC’s USB interface isn’t very good in handling jitter. Now with the Roon 1. Also HQPlayer has a horrible interface so needed roon as the front end. That's because, for some reason, most players look like iTunes but with a broader functionality and the absence of iTunes store. Team that with the fact that Roon, could divert its audio stream directly to HQPlayer and it was game over. For a direct USB output, HQPlayer is also superior in a bit-perfect playback, even without any upsampling. This app also supports VST3 plug-ins. Y Audio Server I would like to know which version of Audirvana Acces , Studio or Origin with as endpoint Hqplayer Destop or Embeded? knowing that I am under optimized windows 11 Pro thank you for your comeback cpasmoi Felipe, have you tried the JPlay via Roon vs HQplayer via Roon. For Roon itself, compared to Foobar or Audirvana, the sound difference isn't that much, sometimes to justify its First, HQplayer upsampling is amazing but Roon is a lousy Tidal user interface. 我觉得Audirvana Plus 和 HQPlayer 各有各好，设定得当后两者质素相当，不AB比较，两个都能安心享受音乐。 音色未可更多人认同HQPlayer 比 Audirvana Plus 出色，也就是音染和润饰。 不过比较操作介面，那无疑Audirvana Plus 比 HQPlayer 美观、操作便捷太多。 For example, Audirvana supports the execution of high-performance algorithms to download the DAC and avoid oversampling. I say “pretty stable” only because there was a fairly big update a year or so ago & for reasons I never understood, it completely screwed up my library, splitting it into duplicate albums with only 3 or 4 tracks on each album. to match Roon? If not, I will I agree! I have have compared Roon into HQPlayer OS vs Audirvana & JPlay iOS into HQPlayer OS and the latter always come out on top for sound quality. Your experience may vary. I auditioned every music server application available over a two year period, that included Roon, JRiver, Plex with Plexamp, Navidrome, Ampache, Subsonic, Emby, etc. None of the others compare at all. Now I like the interface with the focus features and that multiple people in same house With Audirvāna, enjoy all your streaming and local music with the best playback sound quality from a computer. Amarra 3 vs. As for “linear” vs. It offers a far richer, more colorful presentation, a deeper, fuller soundstage, and it JPlay’s frontend and usability is gorgeous, HQPlayer with NAA for amazing sound quality. So, for me, two reasons to choose an audioplayer on a computer : quality sound and stability. Studio. Jumping in just to update this thread a tad from another perspective. If you plan to use Audirvana in conjunction with HQPlayer, you need HQPlayer Embedded. 8, it’s the perfect music software, just like Spotify, however I’d like to know if many people are agreeing that Roon 1. About us. It is the best of its kind in my (somewhat limited) experience. Other tracks did not have the placement weirdness, although they did have the rich overlay to the sound. The HQPlayer developer’s software is also used in the Holo May DAC (I believe). At least not Sox as it is implemented in Volumio, Audirvana and everywhere else I've tried upsampling. Audirvana Audirvāna Studio vs Roon. The gap between Roon and the others is large. I do own and regularyly employ Amarra Symphony with iRC (ASwiRC), and recently purchased a life-time license to roon and almost immediately thereafter Dirac Live, In terms of sound quality, it reminds me a lot of HQPlayer, very smooth and agreeable. BTW, I do not use any DSP features in either Audirvana or Roon, stream directly from local library or Tidal Is there anyone who can help me understand the Sox/R8Brain upsampling options? I battled my way through the “info” button on the settings page and still couldn’t see when one would choose Sox and when R8Brain. We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. JPlay is an app that acts like a UPnP server and a UPnP Used to use Audirvana and found HQPlayer sounded better. I agree, Audirvana has a great interface, and I do use it for certain types of music. 1kHz file offline using HQPlayer or AuI ConverteR 48x44 [2024] and compare this to what either SDM processing outputs The processing over-head in Audirvana will be revealed. By bobbmd May 12, 2016 in Networking, Networked Audio, and Streaming. @chips666 Thanks - I might just download HQplayer and try it - it does seem that you need quite a powerful PC to run it on though. No problems here, either. Audirvana ‘core’, like Roon, on computer, which sends the music bits (from internet or local files on computer) to streamer How do you think HQPlayer can be used with Audirvana? Audirvana Audirvana Studio vs Roon. I know. With HQPlayer Embedded on Linux, I can play from Audirvana direct to HQPlayer. 8 now has great sound quality and there’s no need for Could HQPlayer be integrated into Audirvana like the much more expensive Roon? HQPlayer has various high sampling and high quality sampling algorithms, as well as noise selection, noise modulation and modulator algorith Audirvanaは、ずっと以前から知っていましたがMac専用ソフトというイメージが強く、なじみもなかったせいか、昨年、Windows版が出ても使用には至りませんでした。 それに比べると、TuneBrowserは少しうるさい感じ、HQplayerは高域がキラキラした感じ、JRIVERは可 I am quite surprised how many positive reviews Audirvana Studio has received. Anyway, after installing the HQPlayer Desktop 4 in my Ubuntu OS system, I found the sound utterly encapturing. Doudou July 7, 2021, 6:45pm #338. Sound Q is very good. image 1380×690 188 KB. The used hardware is a Intel N97 based SBC, running from a linear power supply with optical ethernet to isolate the network nasties nicely away. Amarra 4 Luxe sounds great, but can be buggy, though that’s improved lately. HQPlayer simply sounds more 'processed' or hifi like vs my favored Roon only setup. They are two different categories. shrimpcreole. 2 Audirvana used to be great, the new version is terribly buggy, although the interface is probably the best there is. HQPlayer does not integrate with Audirvana. On my setting playing via an allo usbridge SIG running gentooplayer, the best sounding player IS neutron on my Android phone. Part 1. I don’t know how likely that is but it’s possible I guess. I have a JRMC25 master license, but it mostly collects dust these days. I own A+ and have tried HQPlayer. lucretius July 9, 2021, 3:43am 387. HQPlayer is an offline player with no Tidal or Qobuz integration, but it allows the music from Roon to be played over to HQPlayer. How does HQPlayer upsampling compare to upsampling in Roon, Audirvana, Volumio etc? There are lots of pro’s and cons with upsampling in software (music player program on a pc) vs hardware (DAC). Roon does all that, except easy tagging. The email I received today from Audirvana implied it was possible, but have no idea how to do it! I am on the latest 2. When I go to set the DSD upsampling I want to use Audirvana gives me a choice in the dropdown of only DSD64 and DSD128. Roon sounds just as good with HQPlayer is, for better or worse, far more complicated than Audirvana and uses its own system. Angelos58 July 9, 2024, 12:07pm 8. Roon sounds best combined with HQPlayer. I just purchased A+2. NAA, the VOX Music Player vs. I. Thanks! 1 Like. Neuton is by no means bad, it’s right up there, I just felt that AS (& HQPlayer is most useful when connected to a TOTL system that can reveal what it produces and it's best partnered with a NOS (non-oversampling) DAC that can rip the benefits from the highest sampling rates. I did have a Roon subscription but found it really frustrating to return any of the results I wanted from Tidal via the search function so gave up in the end, although I did like the sound - maybe it's improved, I'll check. For me, it’s a big letdown – you can’t even focus on composer by name so that only favourites will show (streaming through Qobuz). I also tried to eliminate any placebo effect by going back and forth between the Windows version of HQPlayer and the Ubuntu HQPlayer. Amarra is the warmest sounding by far, followed by HQPlayer. Since then I moved away from software upsampling and now use Chord mscaler so don’t need roon for what I originally got it for. 5 on a 2013 MacBook Pro vs Roon on a Sonic Transporter server (Linux). Jriver and Audirvana are better, but no where near Roon. The software includes the following features: Easily Play high-res audio: When connected to a USB DAC device you can easily play hi-res audio, such as DSD files purchased from a music distribution site. For a discussion of how memory handling affects ground plane noise, see this discussion between John Swenson (designer of power networks for chips for AT&T and successors for decades) and Gordon Rankin (originator of the Streamlength protocol that first Having tried Volumio, Moode, HQplayer OS and HQPlayer NAA here's what I'm using. Could HQPlayer be integrated into Audirvana like the much more expensive Roon? HQPlayer has various high sampling and high quality sampling algorithms, as well as noise selection, noise modulation and modulator algorith Sorry this is Audirvana with DMG Audio plug in EQuick is one that I use. SoX does not. The sound was not as good as when HQPlayer played alone. HQPlayer is a little complex to set up, but once set, it’s left alone and Roon is the GUI. Audirvana does sound better than Roon on its own, and if you're happy with the Audirvana experience, there's no need to pay extra for Roon. I still have a subscription to Audirvana. Audirvana now for months. The sound quality is there, but more importantly, the music brought a sense of immersion to it. This is THE place where audiophiles and audio companies discuss vintage, contemporary and new audio products, music servers, music streamers, computer audio, digital-to-analog converters, turntables, phono In a sense, applications like Amarra, Audirvana Plus, and Pure Music hot-wire the computer, bypassing certain parts of the OS to create better sound. 5 and J Audirvana Audirvāna Studio vs Roon. , and decided that Logitech Media Server was the best solution for me. By shrimpcreole April 24, 2015 in Software. Doudou: HQPlayer, actually its full name is HQPlayer Desktop, is an audiophile player that is a derivative of a professional mastering application that is used in the musical industry, and whose name is HQPlayer Pro. It's very competitive with the audiophile darling, Roon, when configured with the appropriate plug-ins, which is an easy task. I find it sounds a little better Audirvana comes with it’s own upsampling algorithms. I have not tried Audirvana in UPnP. Neutron remains superior. Recommended Posts. To my ears, A+, HQP and Roon - for instance - have a The Audiophile Optimizer tweaked Windows 10 running Roon into HQPlayer now surpasses Euphony Stylus to my ears. 8k Junior Member Posted May 12, 2016. To be fair, I did not see that as a negative, but it didn’t work too well with my Mojo & 1840 headphones. Perhaps Roon will incorporate support for other players in the future, like they already do for HQPlayer, so those using Audirvana and the like can plug-in to Roon as the processing software while Roon handles everything else. You may want to start with that. For me, Audirvana sounds good, but to my ears it’s not the best. You search your library or you search your streaming but not both at the same time. Whether you want to add a touch of EQ or view Hi, i own Audirvana 3. HQPlayer Desktop has the playback features of HQPlayer Pro. bobbmd. 2. One +1 for Roon Radio. 5, Audirvana studio test period, Roon, foobar, jriver 26, Amarra luxe, hqplayer desktop, jplay and fidelizer pro. HQplayer does the opposite. It’s also generally recommended to turn on “Headroom management” and set it to -3db since it’s With Audirvana to MoOde in UPnP vs Roon in Squeezelite I have a very hard time telling the difference. #hqplayer vs audirvana for mac# Free Mac Media Player – The best free all- in-one media player for Mac users. 9 OS on both the Sonicorbitor and the UltraRendu and use HQPlayer 5. If you only need to do one or two things, like process and serve music files, you can strip down the OS, removing many unnecessary processes, increasing the accuracy and speed of the one or two But the price was high, and I was not satisfied at all with the SQ that I was getting from Roon’s integration with HQPlayer. The user experience on the others pales in comparison to Roon. Many Audirvana users are at a minimum unhappy and at an extreme pissed off about Studio including how it handles tags, the interface, subscription versus purchase,, etc. No better way to discover new music via my Qobuz subscription and the algorithm absolutely destroys JRMC’s attempt to provide a similar service (although, in all fairness, JRMC has a lot less to work with given the relatively small number of files on my own network as compared to The Pi4 / HQPlayer combo can also run a closed-form upsampling -- but with 4 64-bit CPU's running fast and with access to memory and time (creating lag!), it will run 1,000,000-tap filters -- ultimately it sounds better to me. Probably its own topic but Roon Core sends bit perfect audio streams over the network. 5 or Roon orAfter if you are searching for a most analog sounding player Hqplayer desktop. Better than AS or Audirvana 3. Jud November 16, 2021, 8:59pm 81. 5 issue with Ropieee's driver implemenation, as opposed to Pi2AES. Audirvana is a media player software designed especially for music listening enthusiasts and audiophiles looking for a music player that can handle high-fidelity digital audio and top-notch audio listening equipment. 5 w/Roon. You can run HQP Embedded on a separate First, I want to say that HQPlayer is not a replacement for Audirvana. HQPlayer Embedded can function as a UPnP Renderer. Posted May 12, 2016. The Audirvana Studio interface is great compared to Roon in this regard, but Studio does not support HQ I have noticed that Audirvana tends to use standards, and UPnP/DLNA is a standard, however much abused. So for me, the subscription was not justified. HQPlayer’s playback of DSD is superior by far, and is quite better for PCM. I want to upsample to DSD512. ). There is still very noticeable difference between Roon and Audirvana, with Audirvana winning every time. And regardless of the quality of the DAC, HQPlayer provides a great playback, even with the most expensive DACs. This is in the Pi2AES touchscreen case. Roon or Audirvana; For ease of use: Roon with HQPlayer. Mac用再生ソフトウェアとして定評のある再生ソフトウェア「Audirvana」が、この5月に新たに「Audirvana Studio」に進化した。サブスクリプション型 #Audirvana vs hqplayer update# The improvement to Roon comes with a hefty price - HQPlayer costs RM1,084. Played around with audirvana for a couple of hours, and that was enough. Another disqualification. How do you think HQPlayer can be used with Audirvana? HQPlayer Embedded is run on Linux without a GUI, and can stream files to Audirvāna via UPnP. Coojee July 8, 2021, 1:55pm 374. Euphony can also accommodate Roon under its own OS. This can be and has been tested. What is Audirvana. Īfter trying to resolve this, reverting to an earlier version etc without success, I audirvana plus 2. Cloclo August 29, 2022, 11:29am 2. Audivarna + Hqplayer Desktop - Studio - Audirvana. Just pricey. I know what it is way too complex for non audio techies. Audirvana is however much more detailed and provides the biggest soundstage (both in width and depth). . I also made many of my friends buy it as a good solution. I'm willing to explore that as an option when the time comes. Ropiee because of its gorgeous Roon touchscreen interface and connectivity with Roon. Do you plan on adding Hqplayer support directly? i. It integrates with Roon, but with this integration, there is a perdition of the quality of sound. I'm assuming JRiver Media Center would be able to play files to the HQPlayer Embedded device using UPnP/DLNA and do gapless playback. Agoldnear January 15, 2024, 10:58pm 68. Coojee July 7, 2021, 8:34am #316. Audirvana is a piece of software that works like a UPnP server and has its own UPnP controller interfase: the Audirvana Remote App, which controls the Audirvana server exclusively, next to the interface on Mac and Windows. Enter HQPlayer. The processors in DACs tend to have not much horse power so generally use very simple and crude upsampling methods. And HQPlayer sounds more natural than Audirvana. It’s about bit-depth conversion, and not bit-rate. The customer support is also horrendous, I too am looking for an alternative now. But then you get a Roonish sound signature that is less pleasing in my opinion than the Stylus player. Agoldnear June 16, 2023, 3:03pm 8. 2 Likes. The title of your thread is mistaken. Roon cannot manage Tidal playlists. This makes the software a solid addition for users with a large collection of high-quality audio saved locally on their I’ve been using Audirvana for two years, about the the sound quality it is the best player. Is there a way to install this Linux Audirvana beta on my Sonicorbitor and use the UltraRendu as an endpoint. Its library management is poor. For Roon itself, compared to Foobar or Audirvana, the sound difference isn't that much, sometimes to justify its high price. Audirvana is excellent too. For this and After trying a lot Since Many Years Neutron music player it s the best choice. I would like to dump the Roon subscription service. Followers 0. There have been some improvements and it seems a little more stable, but meh. I m first a music lover. HQplayer audio, to me, becomes more restrictive and slightly muted compared to JRiver or Audirvana. imadch December 20, 2023, 10 First, HQplayer upsampling is amazing but Roon is a lousy Tidal user interface. Of the others, Audirvana is the best programmed, but I personally do not care for its sound. 9. Can you supply documentation from the HQ Player or foobar2000 user Hi, if you don’t intend to use HQPlayer’s DSP at all, I can’t think of any advantage. Amarra is a mess. With direct communication via an API, HQPlayer Desktop would also be usable. Derek July 9, 2021, 4:48am 388. I haven't seen any confirmation from others I tried this software for a week and now I am proud owner of Neutron for Windows, Audirvana 3. Euphony has the ability to run HQPlayer inside Roon in both 30 minute free trials or purchased full version. I suggest you try to search for ‘Audirvana vs Roon’ on Google and a lot of I also chose not to upgrade Audirvana Plus to V. X. I discovered also an ugly Russian player with a horrible UI, that sounds better than most of the players, including Audirvana. Interface Roon is the best. Roon has another advantage, it can integrate with HQPlayer’s resampling which I find better than Audirvana 3’s upsampling algorithm. Tidal with Audirvana? I thought that the music was directly send to our DAC from the Tidal internet service and that is the DAC who had the job of decoded the track. If the music is played well it sounds correct, if not you can clearly hear glitches and breaks due to a non-continuous data stream. But I listen a lot with headphones. Audirvana, the old version not studio, works but it doesn't really integrate your library with streaming. The connection goes no longer via UPNP but via a direct interface. Posted April 24, 2015. . 1. Suffice to say that a lot of people enjoy to use ‘audiophile’ software (like Audirvana, HQPlayer, Roon Hats off to AS for doing this standalone in system, vs heavylifting serverwork for Roon and HQplayer being done in a relatively powerful iMac elsewhere in the network. Euphony can also be combined with HQPlayer, but I never really managed to get it working reliably. Otherwise, I was just And I really don't understand the whole WASAPI vs ASIO vs Direct Sound vs MME thing. Both Amarra 4 and Audirvana have a functional iTunes integration mode. I can’t imagine living without Roon. First impression for whatever reason I don't get, Roon+HQPlayer sounds better than HQPlayer on its own. Roon as well. Audirvana - The Smackdown. Today I tested Audirvana Studio and to my immense amazement, the sound is not the same. I also use Qobuz and Tidal a lot. There are no subtleties or nuances to hear if the program functions correctly. SSD drives are still very expensive, so I converted progressively during the last years my DSD files to DSF-WV, and with Covid-19 confinement I had #Hqplayer vs audirvana update. But with Audirvana is limited to PCM content while on HQPlayer can be used also with all DSD content as long you disable native playback (DirectSDM). I realize that HQplayer has various filters and all have some impact but I could never get back to JRiver with any setting I used. The two I compared are UPNP apps so the renderer (HQPlayer OS in my comparison) is doing all the work and the result is a native feed. dabassgoesboomboom May 18, 2019, HQPlayer does amazing things to music when upsampling PCM. It works with external vendors unlike JRiver. I agree that Damien is probably fixing issues. Roon's integration with HQplayer allowing excellent processing/upsampling and streaming to an NAA endpoint vs DLNA However, you will find agreement from most, that having Audirvana/r8Brain or SoX do the conversion, is the right thing to do, in order to remove the processing overhead from the DAC platform, so to give it the best chance of providing the highest-quality of reproduction it is capable of, with any given digital-audio file. 38. When I connect my MacBook to my OPPO BDP-105’s USB interface, Audirvana 3 sounds better. We need an iTunes alternative because we want to listen I am now comparing Roon on a ROCK vs Audirvana on a MacBook Pro, both streaming into OR that is connected to the USB input of C2700. The Audirvana Studio interface is great compared to Roon in this regard, but Studio does not support HQplayer without going through uPnP and HQplayer embedded. HQPlayer has a remote control, HQPD control, that sweetens a bit, I stress a bit, its unbelievably spartan looking UI FYI, I used Roon for many years with and without HQPLAYER and have a lifetime subscription. Thank you again. Have been extensively testing HQPlayer vs. Indeed with Roon and HQPlayer, I have found the best of both worlds in music streaming - good sound quality and good User Interface plus stability and excellent WASAPI on Audirvana & Foobar, I’m not entirely sure the mode I was using on Neutron. On the go is no contest, Arc is half-baked and unreliable, and And HQPlayer sounds more natural than Audirvana. I have similarly waded through the HQ Player documentation without understanding it. Is it possible in Audirvana like HQPlayer to change the bitrate of files? I have many 24 bit files but my DAC is only linear to 16 bit so I need to force the player only to output 16 bit to my DAC. There isn't a use that goes by without a crash, stall, unable to find track etc etc I wouldnt advise anyone purchasing it. But Audirvana Audirvāna Studio vs Roon. I've tested it with Chord Hugo 2 and the result was a bit meh. Both players can live side by side, for those who stream, of course, but also for people who play their own HQplayer does the opposite. HQPlayer is all about a great playback of local files. Probably has cobwebs in it. I use the communication from Audirvana to HQPlayer Embedded via UPNP to, for example, use the very good integration of EQ settings in HQPlayer and the many upsampling options, especially for DSD. lucretius July 8, 2021, 3:13pm 376. 4 Likes. Yes, running Audirvana 3. HQPlayer is derivate from a professional mastering application for sound production that was not intended to serve as a music player. After installing, tuning and finagling with the HQPlayer software I found it to be the best sounding audio engine I had yet to experience. I’m just curious to understand the principle 本帖最后由 chn-gm 于 2022-9-25 21:52 编辑 最终，还是foobar+Jriver！ foobar、roon、jriver、audirvana、hqplayer、lms、daphile，用完一圈、还是最喜欢foobar：操作简洁、功能全面。 用过 播放输出和接收处理分离 的方案（设备1（我这里是macbook）把音频数据传给设备2处理和输出）、再也回不去单机播放了（对我来说 JRiver vs. Installed on it is Arch Linux 6. I am configured HQPlayer via Roon. I HQPlayer, compared to Roon, has better upsampling algorithm. 再生ソフトも音質を左右します。無料の「foobar2000」や、雑誌評論で使われることの多い「Audirvana」をお使いですか？ 2万円ほどで手に入る（逸品館で取扱中）高音質再生アプリ「HQ Player」を使われたことはありますか？ Hello there, I used to use Roon, the older version and I found that it very objectively has a sound quality that’s not nearly as good or better than the Audirvana player. And which options for each. 5 vs roon/roon + hqplayer IGNORED audirvana plus 2. You may want to consult "Recommended hardware" -section here. Running Audirvana on a Windows 11 PC and using a Cambridge Audio CXN100 as my DAC. 5 Audirvana and HQPlayer have both a similar higher quality DSD output than native on my DAC. Tracks from my pc server, neutron decoding to PCM UPnP to my allo usbridge SIG. I'm starting this thread to document my attempts to get SoX to deliver better results. I know that the Audirvana sound is better but Why is a difference in sound between Tidal with Tidal app vs. the rather basic Roon Radio. Thereare audiophiles who have better Hi Fi than I do. Roon and Audirvana support is good. Roon and Audirvana are not at all in the same league for sound quality. What’s Best Forum is THE forum for high end audio, product reviews, advice and sharing experiences on the best of everything else. HQPlayer is another animal, and for my money it makes computer audio worth fussing with. IMO, in a direct USB output First time user of Roon+HQPlayer. Now, I’m not one to believe bits are bits and we’re all hearing the same thing but if you’re using a network bridge / streamer then Core has no influence on the sound (as long as its not under-powered, network is up to the task, etc. Audirvana – Detailed Comparison When it comes to a Mac music player, users are often confused. I run it on a 2012 Mac Mini. Derek July 9, 2021, 4:51am Audirvana Studio vs Audirvana sound quality. ngiw gpxmry bmhom zhuj yybd hdzx woj luqslilr xxj tmd pya xsxjfwxjr nldlic usr uwktrnt